Climate Change

Earth’s carbon dioxide levels are likely the highest they've been in 15 million years

“It’s not just one person’s crazy number.”
By Mark Kaufman  on 
Earth’s carbon dioxide levels are likely the highest they've been in 15 million years
Earth’s average global temperature from 2013 to 2017, as compared to a baseline average from 1951 to 1980. Credit: nasa

We’ve entered some profoundly unfamiliar planetary territory.

Amid a backdrop of U.S. politicians still questioning whether the changing climate is attributable to humans (it is), it's quite likely that we’ve actually boosted Earth's carbon dioxide -- a potent greenhouse gas -- to the highest levels they’ve been in some 15 million years.

The number 15 million is dramatically higher than a statistic frequently cited(opens in a new tab) by geologists and climate scientists: That today's carbon levels are the highest they've been on Earth in at least 800,000 years -- as there's irrefutable proof trapped in the planet's ancient ice(opens in a new tab).

Though scientists emphasize that air bubbles preserved in ice are the gold carbon standard, there are less direct, though still quite reliable(opens in a new tab) means to gauge Earth's long-ago carbon dioxide levels. These measurements, broadly called proxies, include the chemical make-up of long-dead plankton(opens in a new tab) and the evidence stored(opens in a new tab) in the breathing cells, or stomata, of ancient plants.

Scientists have identified this 15 million number by measuring and re-measuring proxies all over the world.

Mashable Image
Ancient air stored in ice core bubbles. Credit: nasa

“It’s a good scientific documentation, but it’s an indirect measure,” Michael Prather, a professor of earth system science at the University of California Irvine, said in an interview.

“And there’s several lines of evidence,” Prather, a lead author on UN climate reports, added, citing the carbon dioxide evidence in fossilized marine life. “It’s not just one person’s crazy number.”

Direct measures of the air show carbon dioxide levels have recently hit 410 parts per million, or ppm, the highest-recorded number in human history.

“For the most part, carbon dioxide was below 400 ppm for the last 14 million years or so,” Matthew Lachniet, a paleoclimatologist at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said in an interview.

There may have been a time, roughly 3 million years ago during an extremely warm period called the Pliocene Epoch(opens in a new tab) -- when sea levels were between 16 and 131 feet higher than today -- during which carbon concentrations could have approximated present levels.

“However, the concentration of CO2 currently in Earth’s atmosphere is higher or is nearly as high as it has been over any time period during the past 15 million years,” Daniel Breecker, a paleoclimatologist at the University of Texas at Austin Jackson School of Geosciences, said over email.

The critical difference today, however, is that carbon emissions are expected to continue rising. With the unprecedented burning of fossil fuels, carbon accumulations will simply keep going up.

Mashable Image
Different proxies, like phytoplankton (red), give scientists a good range (blue background) of past atmospheric carbon dioxide estimates. Credit: United Nations/Ipcc

“Of course, C02 concentrations aren’t stopping today,” said Lachniet. “We’re probably going to blow through 550 to 600 ppm.”

Those sorts of high carbon concentrations haven't been experienced on Earth in well over 20 million years, noted Lachniet.

“That makes this conversation even more stark,” he said.

Some folks in the climate community, though, have even argued that today’s climate has the highest concentration of total greenhouse gases -- when gases like methane (natural gas) and nitrous oxide are added to the mix -- in 20 million years.

This idea, called the “carbon dioxide equivalent(opens in a new tab)” has some support(opens in a new tab) in the climate community, though a variety of climate scientists we reached out to weren’t aware of research supporting this 20 million-year claim.

In the end, it’s not just the actual concentration of carbon dioxide that matters -- it’s how sensitive the planet ends up being to this dramatically rising carbon accumulation, noted Breecker.

Already, Earth has proven quite sensitive

Since the onset of the Industrial Revolution, Earth's average temperature has risen by 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit, or 1 degree Celsius.

Major consequences have already been regularly observed in Earth’s water cycle -- bringing greater odds of extremes in deluges and drought. The most easily-predicted results, record-breaking heat waves and historic wildfires, are manifesting globally, as well as more complex atmospheric changes.

“It [global warming] raises sea levels and makes storm surges worse, it makes the atmosphere wetter, leading to flooding from extreme rainfall, and warming ocean temperatures provide extra energy to tropical storms,” climate scientist Stefan Rahmstorf, head of Earth System Analysis at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, said in September.

"The polar ice is melting, in the ocean the Gulf Stream System is weakening, and in the atmosphere the jet stream is getting weird,” Rahmstorf added.

Unlike previous geologic epochs, the defining circumstance today isn’t just notably high carbon in the air -- it’s how fast it’s all accumulating.

The natural world both loads and removes carbon from the atmosphere over long periods of thousands to tens of thousands of years.

For example, a warm period called the Eemian, which ended around 120,000 years ago, slowly melted a significant portion of Greenland’s ice sheets -- even with profoundly lower(opens in a new tab) carbon concentrations of around 280 ppm.

But these days, the climate hasn’t yet caught up.

“We’re warming so fast that we haven’t even begun to let Greenland melt,” noted UC Irvine’s Prather.

Where civilization ultimately ends up, carbon-wise, is contingent upon how quickly global societies transition to clean energy, and generate electricity without a deep reliance on fossil fuels.

“I would argue what's really relevant is where we stabilize out,” said Lachniet. “Over the next hundred years we really set the next 10,000 years of climate history.”

Mark is the Science Editor at Mashable.


Recommended For You

'Mrs Davis' review: Relentlessly original, but more trick than miracle


'Yellowjackets' Season 2, episode 5: Javi's drawing is a big clue

'Doctor Who' gives us our first look at Ncuti Gatwa as the new Doctor

More in Science
Stasher vs. Ziploc Endurables: What are the best reusable food storage bags?

Florida students 'Walkout 2 Learn': How to join their education revolution

Yes, SKIMS' TikTok-viral dress and bodysuits made me look snatched

What does 420 mean? The 'stoner holiday' has a deeeep history.


Trending on Mashable

'Wordle' today: Here's the answer, hints for April 21

Dril and other Twitter power users begin campaign to 'Block the Blue' paid checkmarks

How to remove Snapchat's My AI from your Chat feed

Every surprise song Taylor Swift has performed on 'The Eras Tour' (so far)
The biggest stories of the day delivered to your inbox.
By signing up to the Mashable newsletter you agree to receive electronic communications from Mashable that may sometimes include advertisements or sponsored content.
Thanks for signing up. See you at your inbox!